Sunday, September 9, 2012

Faith is the Power / Foundations of Faith


“If the foundation of faith is not embedded in our hearts,
 the power to endure will crumble.”
                                               
                                                                 -Henry B. Eyring


From that quote, I picture two distinct images in my mind.

First I see an image of a coal power plant. As coal is taken to and burned at a plant, it generates electricity. We can then use that electricity to power everything from lights, to computers, to even cars now. These things help our lives move forward.

 Faith is power.  To generate that power, we need to add elements to our lives such as meaningful scripture study, mighty prayer, and purposeful service. As we let activities like those burn within our souls, they change us and generate faith. Faith is the power—the energy source that motivates us to keep moving forward and endure to the end.




Second, I see an image of a foundation, and this is the image that President Henry B Eyring writes about. In order to have a strong foundation, there must be solid ground underneath. Next you pour the foundation, and after some curing time, you have a strong foundation.

In building a foundation of faith, the only way to have solid ground underneath is to have personal integrity. The actual foundation is then poured as a mixture of different elements. Meaningful scripture study, mighty prayer, and purposeful service would all be good faith-building elements in that mixture.  Next there must be a passage of time to let the mixture harden, which allows the foundation to be strong. Faith takes time to solidify in our souls. Remember, it is letting the right elements have time to solidify, and not the passage of time alone that creates a foundation of faith.



I’m grateful for Elder Eyring’s April 2012 conference talk entitled Mountains to Climb. It has given me two images in my mind that remind me how important faith is in our lives to help us endure to the end and to help us in a world of changing values stay steadfast and immovable.

Friday, September 7, 2012

My Ounce of Prevention



An ounce of prevention is worth a pound of cure.
-Benjamin Franklin


Healthy Eating Plate (healthy-eating-plate-565.jpg)




It is much more cost effective for insurers to try to stop disease before it occurs than it is for insurers to treat disease after it occurs.

Not only is it cheaper to prevent than to cure, doing so improves the quality of life people live. If you’re healthy you tend to stay out of hospitals, have more energy, and don’t get diseases like heart disease and diabetes. Unfortunately, we live in a society that excels at disease care more than actual health care—protecting and caring for your health. It’s easier to treat symptoms than it is to actually deal with underlying issues. However, with this method you just move from one fire to the next, and never extinguish the actual source of the problem.

Employer Physical

In order to encourage healthy habits, reduce healthcare costs, and improve individuals quality of life, my employer has a program that offers its employees $50 for getting a mini physical and another $50 for being healthy according the metrics they measure. If you are deemed unhealthy in a category, there are financial incentives to improve.

I went in on August 30, 2012, for my physical. I was sure that I was going to get the $100 prize because I felt healthy.  My results were as follows:





 *Posting this info is probably a HIPPA violation on myself. Oops. :)


They weren’t worried about body fat. 13% is their target goal for that. What they were worried about was my HDL Cholesterol level. HDL cholesterol is good cholesterol which helps prevent heart disease by cleaning your arteries. It keeps plaque from building up and sticking to the artery walls. The goal there is 40 mg/dL.

Because of my levels of HDL cholesterol, I was not going to get the full $100 because I was putting myself at risk for heart disease. I may not have received the full incentive, but I did receive the motivation to make some changes.


Changes

In order to improve HDL cholesterol, it’s important to exercise regularly, and to eat fruits and vegetables.  It takes months to see results with HDL cholesterol because your blood composition has to change.

Fixing my exercise schedule won’t be too hard. My goal is 30 minutes of moderate exercise 4 days of the week. I was really good at this up until March, when I hurt my left leg and right foot. They’re mostly better now though. I have home equipment, and I bought a pass to the gym. Exercise can be fun if you find the right activities. If you find the wrong ones, it’s torture. Luckily I love to swim, run, and lift moderate weights.

Fixing my diet is going to be the major challenge. I love to drink milk, Capri Suns, juice, and other sugary drinks. I love to eat high sugar foods like ice cream and fruit snacks. I love to eat higher fat foods like sandwiches smothered in mayo and cheese. In fact, I've always joked that my cheese addiction is what would kill me. It was funny because I never believed it. Now it’s not so funny.

For the past week, I’ve made an effort to improve my consumption of fruits and vegetables by focusing on each meal.

For breakfast, I made a lot of whole grain waffles and froze them to make them more convenient. I eat those waffles loaded with fruit, like blackberries, blueberries, and strawberries—no syrup. With that I will have a small glass of orange juice, and a small glass of milk. Other days of the week, I’ll have one bowl of Cheerios, one piece of toast with low-fat peanut butter, a banana, and a small glass of orange juice.

For lunch, I still have sandwiches. However, instead of loading up on cheese and mayo, I load up on vegetables; Green peppers, yellow peppers, tomatoes, avocados, and red peppers piled up high on whole wheat bread. As sides, instead of fruit snacks and a Capri Sun, I have carrots, craisins, nuts, and water. I have to say that I like the new lunch more than I thought I would.

For dinner, I make two weeks worth of meals every other Friday afternoon and then freeze them. The meals have a small portion of low fat meat, like chicken or fish, a lot of vegitables, and some whole grain rice or pasta.

With fruits and vegetables, the saying is 'five to stay alive, but nine is divine'...


Resources

Some of my favorite health resources that have been inspiring me as I start this journey are:

Harvard School of Public Health -http://www.hsph.harvard.edu/nutritionsource/index.html- This site has a lot of health related science boiled down into easy to understand information and graphics.

Well Steps -https://www.wellsteps.com/ - Well Steps is a company that does health consulting for companies. Its president is Steve Aldana, who was a BYU professor until 2007. The company has a book I love to read called The Culprit and the Cure that explains current health research in an easy to understand and apply way.


I’m really making an effort, so hopefully all of these changes will result in high HDL cholesterol levels. I really get scared when I think about a heart attack, a stroke, or diabetes. I’m excited to have another physical in 6 months. Bring on the results because I’ll be ready!

Sunday, September 2, 2012

Lord, is it I?–Cultivating an Environment where Revelation Grows




In Matthew 26, Christ is with his Apostles eating a Passover feast.  As they eat, Christ tells the disciples that one of them will betray him. They are all very sorrowful and every one of them asks, “Lord is it I?”.   

I've always been drawn to the question “Lord, is it I?” because it invites personal reflection and taking an inventory on your life.

In Elder Richard G. Scott’s talk ‘How to Obtain Revelation and Inspiration for Your Personal Life’ from April 2012 General Conference, Elder Scott lists attributes of good soil and bad soil for cultivating revelation.

Revelation can be cultivated abundantly if we are mentally clean, are physically clean, have pure intent, are obedient, and place ourselves in righteous environments.

Revelation can’t be grown if we are haughty, prideful, conceited, or arrogant, if we let emotion rule our lives, or if we seek praise or recognition.

From either of these lists, “Lord, is it I?”

To be mentally clean, am I actively trying to learn and grow, or am I content to watch hours and hours of Netflix each day? What types of material do I fill my mind with?

Is my physical environment disorganized keeping my thoughts cluttered, or am I organized and clean in an environment where I can more easily receive revelation.

How obedient was I this week? Did I actively read scriptures to learn, or did I read just to mark something off my list? How were my prayers? What did I draw from church this week? Did I go to institute?

What did I do this week, solely for attention or praise from others?

What are my motivations? Why do I do what I do?

Do I do things for others, or mainly for myself?

Of course, with each inventory you take, the central question moving forward becomes “How can I improve going forward?”

As we humble ourselves and make needed corrections, we become ‘fertile soil where spirituality grows and produces the fruit of inspiration. This gives us divine power to accomplish what needs to be done.’

Monday, July 16, 2012

The Influence of Social Class On Giving




16 And also, ye yourselves will succor those that stand in need of your succor; ye will administer of your substance unto him that standeth in need; and ye will not suffer that the beggar putteth up his petition to you in vain, and turn him out to perish.

 17 Perhaps thou shalt say: The man has brought upon himself his misery; therefore I will stay my hand, and will not give unto him of my food, nor impart unto him of my substance that he may not suffer, for his punishments are just—

 18 But I say unto you, O man, whosoever doeth this the same hath great cause to repent; and except he repenteth of that which he hath done he perisheth forever, and hath no interest in the kingdom of God.

 19 For behold, are we not all beggars? Do we not all depend upon the same Being, even God, for all the substance which we have, for both food and raiment, and for gold, and for silver, and for all the riches which we have of every kind?


24 And again, I say unto the poor, ye who have not and yet have sufficient, that ye remain from day to day; I mean all you who deny the beggar, because ye have not; I would that ye say in your hearts that: I give not because I have not, but if I had I would give.

 25 And now, if ye say this in your hearts ye remain guiltless, otherwise ye are condemned; and your condemnation is just for ye covet that which ye have not received.

 26 And now, for the sake of these things which I have spoken unto you—that is, for the sake of retaining a remission of your sins from day to day, that ye may walk guiltless before God—I would that ye should impart of your substance to the poor, every man according to that which he hath, such as feeding the hungry, clothing the naked, visiting the sick and administering to their relief, both spiritually and temporally, according to their wants.

 27 And see that all these things are done in wisdom and order; for it is not requisite that a man should run faster than he has strength. And again, it is expedient that he should be diligent, that thereby he might win the prize; therefore, all things must be done in order.

 -Mosiah 4:16-19;24-27




What does the Lord say here about giving among those who have limited resources? He says they are guiltless if they can’t give much, so long as they acknowledge that they would give more if they had more. You can’t just say that and be excused from giving; your heart must truly believe it.

What does the Lord imply, and what can we infer about those who have much? The Lord says the more you have, the more you should give, whether that is of your time, your talents, your knowledge, or your resources. Where much is given, much is required.

Is that what really happens in society today? Do wealthy people actually give more of their time and resources?

I recently read a study published in the Journal of Personality and Social Psychology entitled "Having Less, Giving More: The Influence of Social Class on Prosocial Behavior". Shephane Cote and Bonnie Hayden Cheng from the University of Toronto, and Paul Piff, Michael Kraus, and Dacher Keltner from the University of California-Berkley conducted the study. Their purpose was to examine how social class influences prosocial behavior.

Researchers noted that lower classes have fewer economic resources, fewer educational opportunities, less access to social institutions, subordinate rank in society, increased stress in relationships, and more violence in their homes. The poor attribute these factors as major reasons that there are rich and poor people in the United States. Meanwhile the wealthy can buffer themselves more easily from life’s disruptions by using their material wealth and access. The wealthy are more likely to believe that the rich and poor divide comes from internal traits and efforts. The poor orient to the external social environment, while the wealthy to internal characteristics.

Because the poor orient more towards social environment, the researchers hypothesized lower class individuals would be more concerned with the needs of others relative to upper class individuals, and, guided by this concern, would act in a more prosocial fashion to improve others’ welfare.

To test the hypothesis, the researchers performed four experiments that would test generosity, charitable donations, trust, and helping behavior.

The first experiment was designed to test the generosity levels classes. One week prior to the experiment, the participants received an email where they were asked to answer an online questionnaire about personal information. The week between was designed to reduce the likelihood that the questions would bias their actions during the actual task. The day of the experiment, the participants began by completing tasks unrelated to what the researchers were actually testing. The last task was the actual experiment. In the last task, the participants were informed that they had been paired with an anonymous person in another room. Participants were given 10 points and their task was to decide how many of those points they wanted to keep for themselves, and how many they would give away. Their partner would have no input, and the responses would remain anonymous. Their cash payout for participating would correlate with how many points they had at the end. Higher allocations to the anonymous partner reflected higher levels of altruism because it represented sacrificing their own material interests for the well being of another.

 The researchers found that, as predicted, lower class individuals allocated a larger portion of their points to their partner than upper class participants did.

The second study was designed to test support for charitable donations. Participants were manipulated by the experimenters into feeling they were one social class or the other. After the manipulation, participants were asked to allocate an annual salary into different spending categories including food, housing, gifts, and charitable donations. Finally, participants were asked to provide personal information including salary.
Participants induced to feel less wealthy believed that a greater portion of income should go to charitable donations (4.65%) than those induced to feel wealthy (2.95%).

The third study was designed to test trust among the social classes. In this online study, participants first filled out information about themselves. Each individual was then told they were being remotely paired with another participant. The participant was told they had 30 points to allocate between themselves and their partner. The points they gave to the partner would then be tripled, and the partner would have to opportunity to give points back. For this game trusting meant that one would be willing to allocate points to their partner, despite the risk that their partner might night reciprocate.

As predicted, lower class participants allocated more of their points to their partner in the trust game than wealthy participants did.

The fourth study was designed to test prosocial helping behavior. For this test participants were secretly assigned to a neutral prime or a compassion-inducing prime. The participants were told they would complete a series of tasks with a partner. The first participant was told that the second participant was running late, so the first participant was told to watch a short video clip, and remember as much as they could for a memory test. The neutral prime group watched a clip from the movie All the Presidents Men, while the compassion prime group watched a clip on child poverty. After the video, participants filled out the memory form. A second female actress would then enter the room showing signs of distress. She would ask if she could still participate, even though she was late. The moderator would say that she could, but that some of planned tasks would have to be eliminated due to time. The moderator would then hand the list of tasks to the participant, telling them allocate four tasks to themselves and five to the female participant. The total number of minutes each task would take was listed, and varied from task to task. The more minutes each participant took on themselves, the more willing to help they were.

Participants induced to feel more compassion reported more compassionate feelings, and exhibited more compassionate behavior in the study. Compassion moderates the tendency for lower class individuals to express more prosocial behavior than upper class individuals.

The conclusion of the study is that less affluent people are more attuned to the needs of others because they are more dependent on others to achieve their desired life outcomes. This makes them more aware of people in their same situation. Affluent people can use their wealth and internal talent to fortify them better from the storms of life, and are less attuned to seeking out people who struggle. Affluent people aren’t intentionally stingier, they just have to be primed to recognize problems and to see people struggling around them. Once they are primed, affluent people are just as likely to give as less affluent people.

What is the takeaway? Where much is given, much is required. The Lord expects those with more to give more. If this doesn’t come naturally, you can ‘prime’ yourself by putting yourself in situations where you see suffering around you. Then you are likely to give because you realize you have been given much.

Wednesday, July 11, 2012

The Book of Mormon Musical Review (Act Two)




Act Two

Making Things Up Again—A newly empowered Elder Cunningham sets out teach to teach the people of Africa. All the people of Africa want to hear about is how to stop aids and other tragedies they face. Elder Cunningham makes things about what the scriptures say about curing aides, and other topics. This song is both crude and doctrinally irreverent. Song 2/5; Offensiveness 5/5

Spooky Mormon Hell Dream—After telling white lies about doctrine, Elder Cunningham feels guilty but rationalizes that it is to help the people. Meanwhile, Elder Price is reflecting on his life and the sins he has committed, including stealing a pastry from his kitchen and lying about it, and abandoning his mission companion. He has a nightmare about Hell. There is crude language. Song 4/5; Offensiveness 2/5

I Believe—Awakening from his Hell dream, Elder Price recommits to his mission, and decides that his only goal is to convert the warlord. This song is the most complex so far for me to write about. It shares the feelings of a missionary who envisioned that his mission would be perfect, and the internal struggle he feels when it doesn’t always go that way. That is quite a relatable feeling that many missionaries feel. There are many faith promoting lines, like  ‘I must trust that the Lord is mightier (than a warlord) and always has my back,’ ‘I believe that the Lord, God, created the universe’, and ‘I believe that He sent His only Son to die for my sins’. I have two problems with the song. First, the writers go out of their way to point out some of our unique beliefs without providing any context. That way the beliefs seem less rational. Kolob, blacks and the Priesthood, having planets, and the Garden of Eden in Missouri are all in there. (On a positive note, there are no references to polygamy. If that was in there, the writers would have hit all of the major fringe doctrines.) Second, I have a problem with the assertion that a Mormon just believes. Gaining a testimony is a lifelong process. Yes, there are times when we have doubts, but if you’ve never doubted, and never struggled, you won’t develop the faith necessary to sustain belief. People who just simplistically believe are like those who build their foundations on sand. When the first rain storm comes to challenge their beliefs, the foundation of their testimonies is likely to wash away. Those develop a deeper faith by asking questions, and finding answers through methods like scripture study and prayer are stronger more like those who build their foundations on rock. Song 4/5; Offensiveness 3/5.

Baptize Me—Several Africans agree to be baptized. This is a song Elder Cunningham and one of his female converts sing to each other. All I care to say about this song is that it is a double-entendre. Song 1/5; Offensiveness 5/5.

I Am Africa—The newly successful missionaries feel a oneness with Africa. Song 1/5; Offensiveness 0/5

Orlando—This song is not on the soundtrack, so I have no idea what it is like. For plot movement, this song is Elder Price being once again disappointed by his failure to convert the warlord, and other failures throughout his life.

Joseph Smith American Moses—The Mission President and other Church Leaders come to visit the Uganda because of the success the missionaries have had. The African converts put on a show about what they have learned about the church. This is supposed to be the comedic high point of the show because of the African’s misunderstandings about actual church beliefs, but it is too crude and doctrinally insensitive for me to enjoy it much. The Mission President is stunned at the false doctrine, moves the missionaries to other areas, and declares that none of the converts are actually members of the church. Song 1/5; Offensiveness 5/5.

Hasa Diga Eebowai (Reprise)—This song isn’t on the soundtrack either, but it is the main female convert being sad that she is not actually a member of the church, and will not escape Africa for Salt Lake City. Mad about what happened, the female convert tells the villagers that Elder Cunningham was eaten by a lion.

You and Me (But Mostly Me) (Reprise)—This song is also only in the musical. Elder Cunningham is sad about the turn of events for his converts. Elder Price has an epiphany about how what actually matters is ensuring that religion actually helps people. The two fully reconcile as missionary companions and believers.

(Story break: The villagers convince the female convert that Elder Cunningham had their best interest at heart by making up stories that would give them hope in their daily lives, rather than the actual truth. She forgives Elder Cunningham. Meanwhile, the warlord attacks the village. Elder Price and Elder Cunningham return. Elder Cunningham claims he rose from the dead after being eaten by the lion. The two missionaries drive the warlord out of the village. )

Tomorrow Is A Latter Day—The missionaries and the Africans come together and agree to work together to improve the planet because, after all, we are all Later-day Saints. It features the Africans serving as missionaries for the gospel they follow, which seems to be some the distorted truth that Elder Cunningham taught. For a closer of a musical, it had some good parts (the Hello Reprise) and some boring parts (the rest). Song 2/5; Offensiveness 2/5.

Thoughts

The musical turns out to be rather sweet. It deals with the importance of helping others no matter the circumstances of their lives, being disappointed and finding motivation to carry on, and having hope for a better tomorrow. However, there is no getting around the fact that this musical uses very crude language and has some very crude plot pieces. The musical distorts our doctrine, and is irreverent to stories and teachings that we hold sacred as Latter-day Saints.  If and when it ultimately travels to Salt Lake City, I for one will not be in the audience.

Elder Holland, when speaking at Harvard, talked about the musical briefly and said his response to those who had seen it would be, ‘you’ve seen the musical, now read the book.’ He talked about how the church used the publicity of the musical to promote the ‘I’m a Mormon’ campaign to people in New York and other metropolitan areas.

The church’s official response read, ‘The production may attempt to entertain audiences for an evening, but the Book of Mormon as a volume of scripture will change people's lives forever by bringing them closer to Christ.’

The Book of Mormon does change lives. It does teach doctrines such as faith, baptism, and repentance that, if lived, help people return to live with a God who loves them deeply and personally. It does nothing but preach of Christ, his divinity, and his mission. The stories in the book will change your life if you take the time to study them, reflect on them, and apply their lessons. This is what I Believe.

Monday, July 9, 2012

The Book of Mormon Musical Review (Act One)




This is my review of the Book of Mormon Musical by Trey Stone, Robert Lopez, and Matt Stone. These are the same people who created South Park and Avenue Q, so you know this musical is bound to be offensive in both crude and a doctrinal way.

Why would I want to listen to it then? First, The Book of Mormon Musical is still the biggest hit on Broadway almost two years after its debut. Thousands have seen the show, and tickets are still impossible to get. Within the next few months a Chicago cast, London cast, and touring cast will begin putting on the show. As more people see it, they may have questions about the church. For many, this may be all they know about us. I think it is important to know where they are coming from when that conversation begins. Second, a lot of times I think as members of the church we over-react to criticism and jokes about the church. (Not to say that there isn’t a line that can be crossed. I’m looking at you Bill Mahr.) I think this comes from our background of being persecuted as a church, having our members murdered and being driven from place to place. To relate well to others in society, we need to be able to handle the criticism and mockery better and to not take everything so personally, especially when others don’t mean to be overly offensive. All this said, I don’t intend to listen to this non-stop, memorize it, and embrace it as the best musical of all times because I know that in parts it is crude and doctrinally incorrect. This is purely for understanding.

Hello – This song serves as the introduction the musical. It features missionaries ringing doorbells and introducing people to the Book of Mormon. The song is up-beat, innocent, and fun. It also gives positive introductions to the Book of Mormon, saying the book is a most amazing book, a book about America a long time ago, a book with awesome parts, a book that can change your life, a book of Jesus Christ, a book with information you can really use, a book about eternal life, and that the book is free. The song also introduces Elder Cunningham, a new missionary who is somewhat dumb as to what we actually believe, but that is obvious. There are two brief parts of the song that I dislike. First, they say Jesus lived in the USA. It makes us seem crazy because the U.S. was formed in 1776, and Christ never actually lived here, he just visited thousands of years before that. In the world there is one fold, and one shepherd. We believe he visited people in the old and new world during his ministry. Second, in the song several of the missionaries tell people to have fun in hell if they reject the message. Setting aside our beliefs about the afterlife, seldom (hopefully never, but missionaries aren’t perfect) would a missionary actually say that to someone’s face. Overall I really enjoy this song as an introduction to the musical. Song 5/5; Offensiveness 0/5.

Two By Two – In this song, the missionaries at the MTC are assigned companions and areas of the world to serve by someone that sounds like a game show host. It’s not quite how that works, but it helps move the plot along more so than explaining the call letter, and how companions are actually assigned. It captures how missionaries wonder where they will go, and how they hope for fun locations before they actually know where they’ll be. The missionaries are the soldiers of the Church of Jesus Christ—of Latter-day Saints. The song is up-beat and enjoyable. Key to the plot is Elder Price, the hot-shot know-it-all missionary is assigned to serve with Elder Cunningham, the idot missionary. They will serve in Uganda. Song 4/5; Offensiveness 0/5.

You and Me (But Mostly Me)— This song is about the hope a missionary feels when he first goes out. He hopes to change the world, and convert hosts of people. Elder Price knows he is going to be a good missionary, while Elder Cunningham knows he is not as good. Every hero needs a sidekick, and every captain a mate, right? Song 4/5; Offensiveness 0/5

Hasa Diga Eebowai—Did I mention this musical was written by the creators of South Park? Here is the first evidence of that. Let’s just say that the title translates to something that says the people of Uganda don’t care much for God. When bad things happen, they curse God. It’s the only way for them to get through war, poverty, famine, and everything else bad that happens. Having a saying makes is all seem better. Yeah. This song is crude and offensive. It makes Africa seem like a terrible and a backwards place. It uses crude and offensive language throughout. I would have only given this song a 3 or 4 on the offensive scale, but the tribal chants the last minute of the song shoot it straight to the top of the scale. Song 2/5 Offensiveness 5/5

Turn it Off—This is the District Leader teaching the new missionaries how to deal with disappointment, but I’m pretty sure this song is only in there to attack the Church’s position an homosexuality. ‘When you start to get confused about thoughts in your head, don’t feel those feelings, hold them in instead’. When it is pointed out that you’re okay with the church if you don’t act on those feelings, the song turns into ‘keep it down, like a dimmer switch on low, because nobody needs to know’. Just know that the church does not tolerate abuse whatsoever, thinks you should be with dying family members instead of at the Apple Store, and knows that God loves all of his children unconditionally, but expects chastity from all people who are not married. Also, I feel bad if people are so simplistic that they believe they can ignore problems and they go away. Part of the purpose of prayer is understanding and accepting God’s will. Ignoring reality does not draw you closer to God and does not enlighten you. If you really have to struggle to understand an issue, that is when God can tutor you, and that is when you grow the most.  Song 4/5; Offensiveness 4/5.

I Am Here For You—Elder Cunningham tries to comfort Elder Price, who is discouraged because they haven’t baptized anyone yet. Elder Price has doubts that they will, while Elder Cunningham has faith they will, and that his dad will finally be proud of him. Song 2/5; Offensiveness 0/5

All-American Prophet—This song is all about Joseph Smith. It explains that he was a prophet who found the plates, met with Moroni, translated the Book of Mormon, published and distributed the book, moved west, and was ultimately martyred.  The song is factually inaccurate, and does its best to make the story seem untrue in my opinion. They go out of their way to make it seem like Joseph simply started digging by a tree in his backyard to find them. In reality, he was lead to them by the angel Moroni after other miracles had transpired. God puts people where he needs them to be, so it is no surprise that Joseph was near the plates. The major problem I have with the song is that it repeatedly argues that Joseph refused to let anyone else see the plates and even if it made people question him, and that that questioning was what God was going for. Right in the front of every copy of the Book of Mormon, there are statements from 11 witnesses that they saw the physical plates. Song 3/5; Offensiveness 4/5

Sal Tlay Ka Siti—An African woman starts believing in the church because of the danger she faces in Africa, and thinks that Salt Lake City must be Paradise on Earth. Paradise? Maybe not, but I really like Salt Lake! It is interesting to listen to what the woman believe Paradise would be like. This song is the most ballad-like of the first act.  Song 3/5; Offensiveness 0/5

Man Up- This song leads into intermission and has a rock tinge. Elder Price is discouraged, and requests a transfer to Orlando. He is sure the Lord has made a mistake on his mission call. He also dumps Elder Cunningham as a companion. (As if that is how either of those things remotely work! I’m sure a lot of missionaries wish that it were like that though…) Alone, Elder Cunningham realizes that he must man up and be the leader now. Song 2/5; Offensiveness 1/5

End of Act One

Wednesday, July 4, 2012

Freedom


I'm thankful to live in a country where I am safe and where I am free to pursue the things that matter most.